Članak
mar 29
Nazad

PRIVREDNA DRUŠTVA I PRIVREDNO SUDSTVO

Mirko Vasiljević

10.5937/PiP2003007V
SAŽETAK /

Kompanijskopravna regulativa privrednih društava, kao sfera materijalnog prava, sama po sebi nije i ne može biti zatvoren sistem. Praktičan pravni život brojnih materijalnopravnih instituta kompanijskog prava moguć je samo u kompletnom pravnom okruženju i u finoj saradnji materijalnopravne i procesnopravne regulative. U ovom trenutku srpsku pravnu scenu odlikuje evidentan raskorak između težnji zakona koji uređuje sferu materijalnog prava privrednih društava (Zakon o privrednim društvima) da prati trendove istovetne regulative vodećih evropskih zemalja i harmonizovane regulative iz ove sfere na nivou EU i zakona koji uređuju postupke izvršenja ovih instituta u praksi, kako parnične, tako i vanparnične; kako sudske, tako i arbitražne. Ovo, naravno, ne znači da je u svakom pogledu i regulativa materijalnopravnih instituta, posebno instituta koji imaju i svoju procesnu stranu, sasvim prihvatljiva i uzorna.

U ovom radu autor kritički razmatra, pre svega, nedostatke srpske kompanijske regulative koja uređuje institute materijalnog prava, a koji imaju i odgovarajuće procesne aspekte: arbitrabilnost unutrašnjih kompanijskopravnih sporova (članovi društva – članovi, članovi – uprava, članovi privrednog društva – društvo) i uređenih posebnih kompanijskopravnih tužbi (arbitrabilnost derivativne tužbe, arbitrabilnost individualne tužbe, arbitrabilnost tužbe klase akcija); nedostatke uređenja materijalnopravnog režima derivativne tužbe koji uzrokuju njeno retko prisustvo u sudskoj praksi; nedostatke uređenja pravnog režima individualne tužbe (posebno na planu protezanja i u zonu posredne – refleksne štete), kao i nedostatke uređenja pravnog režima tužbe klase akcija, kao vrste kolektivne tužbe (posebno njenog dejstva na neučesnike postupka) i reprezentativne tužbe. Autor zaključuje da je potrebno u materijalnoj regulativi otkloniti svaki osnov mogućeg tumačenja da interni kompanijskopravni sporovi nisu arbitrabilni (mogućnost ugovaranja arbitražnog rešavanja), kao i da je potrebno izvršiti ozbiljne promene postojeće procesne regulative kako bi procesni aspekti kompanijskopravnih tužbi bili nesporni (prigovor litispendencije i prigovor res iudicata – potreba postojanja samo objektivnog identiteta predmeta spora, troškovi postupka kod derivativne tužbe, dejstvo tužbe klase akcija i na neučesnike postupka, praktični aspekti reprezentativne tužbe i slično). Najzad, autor se zalaže i da se za brojne vanparnične postupke, za koje je utvrđena samo nadležnost privrednog suda, utvrdi i mogućnost alternativne nadležnosti javnih beležnika, koji i inače vrše brojne vanparnične postupke (ovim bi se delom kompenziralo skoro potpuno neopravdano isključenje javnih beležnika iz sfere kompanijskog prava u srpskom javnobeležničkom pravu).

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici  
REFERENCE /
  1. Armour John, Black Bernard, Cheffins Brian R., Nolan Richard, „Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States“, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 6, Nr. 4/2009.
  2. Austin Robert P., Ramsay Ian M., Ford Harold A. J., Ford’s Principles of Corporations Law, Chatswood, 2007.
  3. Berger Mark, „Arbitration and Arbitrability: Toward an Expectation Model“, Baylor Law Review, Vol. 56, Nr. 3/2004.
  4. Bernardini Piero, „National Report for Italy, Arbitration in Company Matters“, ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration (eds. Jan Paulsson, Lise Bosman), Supplement No. 48, Kluwer Law International, 2007.
  5. Birds John, Ferran Eilís, Villiers Charlotte, Boyle & Birds’ Company Law, London, 1995.
  6. Block Dennis, Barton Nancy, Radin Stephan, The Business Judgment Rule, 5th edition, Vol. I & II, New York, 1998.
  7. Blumberg Phillip, The Law of Corporate Groups, Boston – Toronto, 1987.
  8. Born Gary B., International Commercial Arbitration, Volume I, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.
  9. Brabant Alexander, Desplats Maxime, Salem Séréna, „Arbitration and Company Law in France“, European Company Law, Vol. 12, Nr. 3/2015.
  10. Brekoulakis Stavros L., „On Arbitrability: Persisting Misconceptions and New Areas of Concern“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. Loukas A. Mistelis, Stavros L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.
  11. Wagner Gerhard, „Officers’ and Directors’ Liability under German Law – A Potemkin Village“, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Vol. 16, Nr. 1/2015.
  12. Varady Tibor, Barceló John J., Mehren Arthur T. von, International Commercial Arbitration – A Transnational Perspective, St. Paul – Minn, 1999.
  13. Vasiljević Mirko, „Arbitrability ratione materiae in company law“, Pravni život, br. 11/2017.
  14. Vasiljević Mirko, „Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi“, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, br. 2/2018.
  15. Vasiljević Mirko, Kompanijsko pravo – pravo privrednih društava, Beograd, 2019.
  16. Vasiljević Mirko, „Civil Law and Business Judgment Rule“, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, br. 3/2012.
  17. Velasco Julian, „Empowering Courts in Corporate Law“, Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 42, Nr. 3/2017.
  18. Veličković Jovana, Derivativna tužba: kompanijsko-pravna i procesno-pravna analiza, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd, 2019.
  19. Wehland Hanno, The Coordination of Multiple Proceeding in Investment Arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
  20. Wild Charles, Weinstein Stuart, Smith & Keenan’s Company Law, Longman, London, 2005.
  21. Goldštajn Aleksandar, Triva Siniša, Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Zagreb, 1987.
  22. Golubović Dragan, „Derivativna tužba – instrument zaštite manjinskih interesa“, Pravni život, br. 11/1995.
  23. Gower Laurence C. B., Principles of Modern Company Law, London, 1992.
  24. Goo Say H., Minority Shareholders’ Protection, London, 1994.
  25. Deskoski Toni, International Arbitration Law, Skopje, 2016.
  26. Dika Mihajlo, „Arbitrabilnost i isključiva nadležnost sudova“, Pravo u gospodarstvu, br. 1/1999.
  27. Di Pietro Domenic, „General Remarks on Arbitrability under the New York Convention“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. Loukas A. Mistelis, Stavros L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.
  28. Douglas Branson, Corporate Governance, Washington, 1993.
  29. Douglas Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
  30. Erickson Jessica, „The Gatekeepers of Shareholder Litigation“, Oklahoma Law Review, Vol. 70, Nr. 1/2017.
  31. Esin Ismail, Celebi Ozgun, Erker Sevgin, Kasarcioglu Demet, „Arbitrating M&A Disputes“, Arbitration in Turkey (eds. Ismail Esin, Ali Yesilimark), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2015.
  32. Ilie Lucian, „Shareholders’ Claims in Investment Treaty Arbitration: No Piece of Cake!“, Romanian Arbitration Journal, Nr. 3/2019.
  33. Jakšić Aleksandar, Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Beograd, 2003.
  34. Jevremović Petrović Tatjana, „Arbitrabilnost sporova u vezi sa pobijanjem odluka skupštine privrednog društva“, Pravo i privreda, br. 4–6/2018.
  35. Jong Jansen B. J. de, „Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss: A Comparative Legal Analysis“, European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 14, Nr. 1/2013.
  36. Knežević Gašo, Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Beograd, 1999.
  37. Knežević Gašo, Pavić Vladimir, Arbitraža i ADR, Beograd, 2009.
  38. Latella Dario, „Shareholder Derivative Suits: A Comparative Analysis and the Implications of the European Shareholders’ Rights Directive“, European Company and Financial Law Review, Nr. 2/2009.
  39. Lee Suet Lin Joyce, „Barring Recovery for Diminution in Value of Shares on the Reflective Loss Principle“, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 66, Nr. 3/2007.
  40. Le Cannu Paul, Dondero Bruno, Droit des sociétés, Paris, 2012.
  41. Loose Peter, Yelland John, Impey David, The Company Director – Powers and Duties, Bristol, 1993.
  42. Lepetić Jelena, Kompanijskopravni režim sukoba interesa – Dužnost lojalnosti, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd, 2015.
  43. Lepetić Jelena, „Mehanizmi kolektivne zaštite u kompanijskom pravu i pravu privrednih društava“, Pravo i privreda, br. 4–6/2016.
  44. Lepetić Jelena, „Pravo akcionara na individualnu tužbu“, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, br. 1/2004.
  45. Markert Lars, „Arbitrating Corporate Disputes – German Approaches and International Solutions to Reconcile Conflicting Principles“, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 8, Nr. 1/2015.
  46. McLaughlin Joseph T., „Arbitrability: Current Trends in the United States“, Arbitration International, Nr. 2/1996.
  47. Mistelis Loukas A., „Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. Loukas A. Mistelis, Stavros L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.
  48. Oberhammer Ewald, Weber Stefan, „The Arbitration Agreement and the Arbitrability – The Arbitration of Corporate Disputes in Limited Liability Companies“, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (eds. Christian Klausegger, Peter Klein, Florian Kremslehner, Alexander Petsche, Nikolaus Pitkowitz, Irene Welser, Gerol Zeiler), Volume 2010, Manzsche Verlags – Verlag C.H. Beck – Stämpfli Verlag, Wien – München – Bern, 2010.
  49. Painter William H., „Double Derivative Suits and Other Remedies with Regard to Damaged Subsidiaries“, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 36, Nr. 2/1961.
  50. Pamboukis Charalambos, „On Arbitrability: The Arbitrator as a Problem Solver“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. Loukas A. Mistelis, Stavros L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.
  51. Pardow Diego G., „The Economic Theory of Derivative Actions“, dostupno na adresi: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1941209, 28. 3. 2020.
  52. Peltier Frédéric, La Corporate Governance, Paris, 2004.
  53. Pennington Robert, Corporate Law, London, 1995.
  54. Perović Jelena, Ugovor o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži, Beograd, 1998.
  55. Pillar Perales Viscasillas Maria del, „Arbitrability of Intra-Corporate Disputes“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. Loukas A. Mistelis, Stavros L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009.
  56. Pitkowitz Nicolaus, „The Arbitration Agreement and Arbitrability, the Arbitrability of Corporate Disputes under Austrian Law – Still Open Questions?“, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (eds. Christian Klausegger, Peter Klein, Florian Kremslehner, Alexander Petsche, Nikolaus Pitkowitz, Irene Welser, Gerol Zeiler), Volume 2014, Manzsche Verlags – Verlag C.H. Beck – Stämpfli Verlag, Wien – München – Bern, 2010.
  57. Puchniak Dan W., Nakahigashi Masafumi, „Japan’s Love for Derivative Actions: Irrational Behavior and Non-Economic Motives for Shareholders Litigation“, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 45, Nr. 1/2012, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn/abstract=2256442, 28. 3. 2020.
  58. Radović Vuk, „O opravdanosti prihvatanja instituta diskvalifikacije direktora“, Pravo i privreda, br. 1–3/2010.
  59. Raeschke-Kessler Hilmar, „Arbitrability of Disputes Concerning Resolutions of a Limited Liability Company (GmbH)“, Association Suisse de l’ arbitrage, Vol. 14, Nr. 3/1996.
  60. Ramsay Ian, „Corporate Governance, Shareholders Litigation and the Prospects for a Statutory Derivative Action“, University of New Wales Law Journal, Vol. 15, Nr. 1/1992, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=922241, 28. 3. 2020.
  61. Redffern Alan, Hunter Martin, International Commercial Arbitration, London, 1992.
  62. Reisberg Arad, „Derivative Actions and the Funding Problem: The Way Forward“, Journal of Business Law, Nr. 5/2006, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=632181, 28. 3. 2020.
  63. Reisberg Arad, Derivative Claims Under the Companies Act 2006: Much Ado About Nothing?, 2008, dostupno na adresi: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1092629, 28. 3. 2020.
  64. Reisberg Arad, „Judicial Control of Derivative actions“, International Company and Commercial Law Review, Vol. 8, 2005, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=706526, 28. 3. 2020.
  65. Reisberg Arad, „Theoretical Reflections on Derivative Actions: The Representative Problem“, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 3, Nr. 1/2006.
  66. Romano Roberta, „The Shareholder Suit: Litigation Without Foundation?“, Foundations of Corporate Law (ed. Roberta Romano), 2nd edition, New York, 2010.
  67. Savković Vladimir, Derivativne akcionarske tužbe, Podgorica, 2004.
  68. Sanborn Jeffrey A., „The Rise of Shareholder Derivative Arbitration in Public Corporations: In Re Salomon Inc. Shareholders’ Derivative Litigation“, Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 31, Nr. 1/1996.
  69. Siems Mathias, „Private Enforcement of Director’s Duties: Derivative Actions as a Global Phenomenon“, Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interest? (eds. Stefan Wrbka, Steven Uytsel, Mathias Siems), Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge, 2012, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1699359, 28. 3. 2020.
  70. Stanivuković Maja, Međunarodna arbitraža, Beograd, 2013.
  71. Schmidt Dominique, Les droits de la minorité dans la société anonyme, Paris, 1970.
  72. Trajković Miodrag, Međunarodno arbitražno pravo, Beograd, 2000.
  73. Thai Lang, Berkahn Matt, „Statutory Derivative Actions in Australia and New Zealand: What Can We Learn from Each Other?“, New Zealand Universities Law Review, Nr. 25/2012, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2982928, 28. 3. 2020.
  74. Thompson Robert, Thomas Randall, „The New Look of Shareholder Litigation: Acquisition-Oriented Class Actions“, Foundations of Corporate Law (ed. Roberta Romano), 2nd edition, New York, 2010.
  75. Thompson Robert, Thomas Randall, „The Public and Private Faces of Derivative Lawsuits“, Foundations of Corporate Law (ed. Roberta Romano), 2nd edition, New York, 2010.
  76. Uzelac Alan, „Nove granice arbitrabilnosti prema Zakonu o arbitraži“, Pravo u gospodarstvu, br. 2/2002.
  77. Fouchard Philippe, Gaillard Emmanuel, Goldman Berthold, Traité de l’arbitrage commercial international, Paris, 1996.
  78. Hamilton Robert, The Law of Corporations, Minnesota, 1991.
  79. Hansell Carol, Corporate Governance, Toronto, 2003.
  80. Carter James, Payton Sophie, „Arbitration and Company Law in England and Wales“, European Company Law, Vol. 12, Nr. 3/2015.
  81. B. Gower Laurence, Davies Paul L., Principles of Modern Company Law, London, 2008.
  82. Cohen Daniel, Arbitrage et société, LGDJ, Paris, 1993.
  83. Cox James D., „The Social Meaning of Shareholder Suits“, Brooklyn Law Review, Nr. 3/1999, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=203373, 28. 3. 2020.
  84. Cozian Maurice, Viandier Alain, Deboissy Florence, Droit des sociétés, Paris, 2006.
  85. Charlesworth John, Charlesworth’s Business Law, London, 1991.
  86. Cheffins Brian R., Company Law – theory, structure and operation, Oxford, 2004.
  87. Christopher Riley, „Derivative Claims and Ratification: Time to Ditch some Baggage“, Legal Studies Durham Research Online, Vol. 34, Nr. 4/2014.