Članak
mar 24
Nazad

SUBORDINACIJA VERSUS AUTONOMIZACIJA I NJIHOVE GRANICE KOD DIGITALNOG RADA

Sanja Stojković Zlatanović

10.55836/PiP_23102A
SAŽETAK /

Promene karakteristika ekonomsko-socijalnog modela kapitalističkog privrednog sistema u pravcu osiguranja veće održivosti, što je, rezultiralo aktuelizacijom i promovisanjem modela održivog razvoja na međunarodnom nivou, dok se, sve više naglašava tzv. „zelena dimenzija“ održivog razvoja, neizostavno su zahtevale određena preispitivanja tradicionalno definisanog modela rada. Naročito se ističe fenomen globalizacije i digitalizacije proizvodnje, što vodi ka svojevrsnoj „globo-digitalizaciji“ rada, te neophodnosti utvrđivanja konceptualnog okvira, kao i pratećeg normativnog uobličavanja novih, faktičkih formi rada u tradicionalnim institucionalnim okvirima zaštite.

Sagledavanjem teorijskih i konceptualnih postulata tradicionalno definisanog modela rada, odnosno tradicionalnog radnog odnosa, sa fokusom na često, u literaturi, isticanog elementa subordinacije kao posebno spornog u okolnostima ubrzane digitalizacije, u radu se nastoji da se kritički analiziraju elementi tzv. digitalnog radnog odnosa. Osim toga, na primeru rešenja nemačkog prava, cilj je utvrđivanje stanja regulative u drugim državama i u domaćem pravu, na način da se doprinese akademskoj raspravi u oblasti koja se ubrzano razvija.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici  
REFERENCE /
  1. Ales Edoardo, „Subordination at risk (of „Autonomisation“): evidences and solutions from three European countries“, Italian Labour Law e-Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1/2019.
  2. Azoeva Olga V., Mikhalevich Larisa Yu, Ostapenko Vladislav A., Shim Galina A., „The labor nature changes and its regulation challenge caused by global digitalization of business“, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, No. 9/2020.
  3. Baudry Bernard, Chassagnon Virgile, „The analysis of employment relationship in contract Economic theories: a critical review based on the nature of American and French labor laws“, Économie et institutions, Online, Nr. 27/2018.
  4. Bogg Alan, Costello Cathryn, Davies ACL, Prassl Jeremias (eds.), The Autonomy of Labour law, Oxford, 2015.
  5. Bozzon Rossella, Murgia Annalisa, „Independent or dependent? European labour statistics and their (in)ability to identify forms of dependency in self‑employment“, Social Indicators Research, No. 160/2022.
  6. Budd John W., Bhave Devasheesh P., The employment relationship: key elements, alternative frames of reference, and implications for HRM, SAGE Handbook of Human Resource Management, 2019.
  7. Vranken Martin, Death of Labour Law? Comparative Perspectives, Carlton, 2009.
  8. Vukorepa Ivana, „Cross-border platform work: riddles for free movement of workers and social security coordination“, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, Vol. 70, br. 4/2020.
  9. Dawu Hu, „The criteria for employment relationship in China“, Labour Law Research Network, Inaugural Conference, University Barselona, June 2013, dostupno na adresi: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.upf.edu/documents/3298481/3410076/2013-LLRNConf_Dawu.pdf/cbbdd091-9b68-40fd-a33b-e3ac4e4a164b, 30. 10. 2022.
  10. Deakin Simon, Njoya Wanjiru, „The legal framework of employment relations“, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper No. 349, dostupno na adresi: https://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/wp349.pdf, 2. 11. 2022.
  11. Dieuaide Patrick, „Autonomy, general working capacity and collective action“, Labour and employment in a globalizing world autonomy, collectives and political dilemmas (eds. Christian Azaïs), Bruxelles, 2011.
  12. Dworkin Ronald, „The model of rules“, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 1/1967.
  13. Kovačević Ljubinka, Valjani razlozi za otkaz ugovora o radu, Beograd, 2016. (Kovačević Ljubinka, Valjani razlozi za otkaz ugovora o radu, Beograd, 2016)
  14. Kovačević Ljubinka, Zasnivanje radnog odnosa, Beograd, 2021. (Kovačević Ljubinka, Zasnivanje radnog odnosa, Beograd, 2021)
  15. Lubarda Branko, Radno pravo, Rasprava o dostojanstvu na radu i socijalnom dijalogu, Beograd, 2012. (Lubarda Branko, Radno pravo, Rasprava o dostojanstvu na radu i socijalnom dijalogu, Beograd, 2012)
  16. Marsh Elizabeth, Perez Vallejos Elvira, Spence Alexa, „The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review“, Computers in Human Behavior, No. 128/2022.
  17. Pallini Massimo, „Towards a new notion of subordination in Italian Labour Law?“, Italian Labour Law e-Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1/2019.
  18. Reljanović Mario, Misailović Jovana, „Radnopravni položaj digitalnih radnika – iskustva evropskih zemalja“, Strani pravni život, br. 3/2021. (Reljanović Mario, Misailović Jovana, „Radnopravni položaj digitalnih radnika – iskustva evropskih zemalja“, Strani pravni život, br. 3/2021)
  19. Rosioru Felicia, „The changing concept of subordination“, dostupno na adresi: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-changing-concept-of-subordination-Ro%C5%9Fioru/fba36801b7baf653a5f51ebedc1e647177413163, 1. 11. 2022.
  20. Spooner Keri, Haidar Ali, „Defining the employment relationship“, Teaching, Learning and Research in Institutions and Regions: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the Pacific Employment Relations Association (eds. Dennis Mortimer, Gordon Stewart), Sydney, 2005.
  21. Stojković Zlatanović Sanja, Ostojić Ivana, „Labour law status of platform workers – between autonomy and subordination“, Regional Law Review, Belgrade, 2021.
  22. Countouris Nikola, Defining and regulating work relations for the future of work, ILO-Geneva, 2019.