Milena Mitrović
10.55836/PiP_24405A
This paper presents different materiality concepts in sustainability reporting. At present, two main streams of materiality concepts in sustainability reporting are single and double materiality. While single materiality primarily deals with the financial impact of sustainability issues on enterprise value (outside-in perspective), double materiality is more far-reaching and deals with both the financial impact and the social impact of companies’ operations, i.e. how companies’ operations affect society and the environment (inside-out perspective). Both concepts are present in leading sustainability reporting standards. The EU has opted to develop its own set of standards and is, in addition to GRI, the main representative of double materiality as the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) place this concept in the spotlight. The IFRS Foundation is the main representative of single materiality. This section will present the main characteristics of both concepts. It will then present the path to standardising reporting standards in the EU. Finally, implications of the different benchmarks employed in standards to define materiality will be explored.
- Ahern Deirdre, “The Sustainability Reporting Ripple: Direct and Indirect Implications of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive for SME Actors”, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4517356, 20. 5. 2024.
- Balp Gaia, Strampelli Giovanni, “Institutional Investors as the Primary Users of Sustainability Reporting”, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4495602, 1. 4. 2024.
- Bebchuk Lucian A., Tallarita Roberto, “The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance”, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 106, Nr. 91/2020.
- Conac Pierre-Henri, “Sustainable Corporate Governance in the EU: Reasonable Global Ambitions?”, RED, Vol. 4, Nr. 1/2022.
- Darbellay Aline, Caballero Cuevas Yanick, “The Materiality of Sustainability Information under Capital Markets Law”, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Finanzmarktrecht, Vol. 95, Nr. 1/2023.
- Davies Paul, “Shareholder Voice and Corporate Purpose: The Purposeless of Mandatory Corporate Purpose Statements”, ECGI Law Working Paper, No. 666/2022, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4285770 1. 4. 2024.
- de Arriba-Sellier Nathan, “The ISSB’s new standards: breaking ground or low hanging fruits?”, ECGI Blog, 13 July 2023, available at: https://www.ecgi.global/publications/blog/the-issbs-new-standards-breaking-ground-or-low-hanging-fruits, 10. 5. 2024.
- Eccles Robert G., Krzus Michael P., Rogers Jean, Serafeim George, “The Need for Sector-Specific Materiality and Sustainability Reporting Standards”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 24, Nr. 2/2012.
- Fasan Marco, Mio Chiara, “Fostering Stakeholder Engagement: The Role of Materiality Disclosure in Integrated Reporting”, Business Strategy and Environment, Vol. 26, Nr. 3/2017.
- Ferrarini Guido, “Redefining Corporate Purpose: Sustainability as a Game Changer”, Sustainable Finance in Europe: Corporate Governance, Financial Stability and Financial Markets (eds. Danny Busch, Guido Ferrarini, Seraina Grünewald), London, 2021.
- Fleischer Holger, “Corporate Purpose: A Management Concept and its Implications for Company Law”, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 18, Nr. 2/2021.
- Garellek Michael, “Less is not more: Non-Financial Disclosures and the Socially Responsible Investor”, Finance durable et droit: perspectives comparées (ed. Hugues Bouthinon-Dumas, Bénédicte François, Anne-Catherine Muller), Paris, 2020.
- Gergely Szabó Dániel, Engsig Sørensen Karsten, “New EU Directive on the Disclosure of Non-financial Information (CSR)”, ECFR, Vol. 12, Nr. 3/2015.
- Gergely Szabo Daniel, Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in the EU, Eleven Publishing, The Hague, 2016.
- Göttsche Max, Schiemann Frank, Habermann Florian, Spandel Theresa, Tetteroo Max, “Striking a balance: The importance of double materiality in sustainability reporting”, ECGI Blog, 26 September 2023, available at: https://www.ecgi.global/publications/blog/striking-a-balance-the-importance-of-double-materiality-in-sustainability, 10. 5. 2024.
- Hopt Klaus J., “Corporate Purpose and Stakeholder Value – Historical, Economic and Comparative Law Remarks on the Current Debate, Legislative Options and Enforcement Problems”, ECGI Law Working Paper, No. 690/2023, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4390119, 1. 4. 2024.
- Iozzelli Laura, Sandoval Velasco María del Carmen, “Mandatory or Voluntary? The hybrid nature of sustainability disclosure in the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)”, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Florence School of Banking and Finance, Policy Paper, RSC PP 2023/08, available at: https://fbf.eui.eu/publication/mandatory-or-voluntary-the-hybrid-nature-of-sustainability-disclosure-in-the-eus-corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive-csrd/, 10. 5. 2024.
- Jebe Ruth, “The Convergence of Financial and ESG Materiality: Taking Sustainability Mainstream”, American Business Law Journal, Vol. 56, Nr. 3/2019.
- Jørgensen Sveinung, Mjøs Aksel, Jacob Tynes Pedersen Lars, “Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: tensions and potential resolutions”, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 13, Nr. 2/2022.
- Jørgensen Sveinung, Mjøs Aksel, Jacob Tynes Pedersen Lars, “Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: tensions and potential resolutions”, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 13, Nr. 2/2022.
- Mähönen Jukka T., Palea Vera, “Analyzing double materiality through the lense of the European political constitution: Implications for interoperability and standards-setting”, Nordic & European Company Law, LSN Research Paper Series, No. 24-03, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4731089, 20. 4. 2024.
- Mayer Colin, “The Governance of Corporate Purpose”, ECGI Law Working Paper, No. 609/2021, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=3928613, 1. 4. 2024.
- Mitrović Milena, “Dužnosti direktora u održivom korporativnom upravljanju”, Pravo i privreda, Vol. 61, Nr. 3/2023.
- Moratis Lars, van Liedekerke Luc, “Materiality in sustainability reporting according to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards: (What) does it matter?”, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4702851, 10. 5. 2024.
- Mosca Chiara, Picciau Chiara, “Making Non-Financial Information Count: Accountability and Materiality in Sustainability Reporting”, Finance durable et droit: perspectives comparées (edс. Hugues Bouthinon-Dumas, Bénédicte François, Anne-Catherine Muller), Paris, 2020.
- Ringe Wolf Georg, “Investor-led Sustainability in Corporate Governance”, Law Working Paper No 615/2021, available at: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/ringefinal.pdf, 20. 4. 2024.
- Saad Aisha I., Strauss Diane, “The New “Reasonable Investor” and Changing Frontiers of Materiality: Increasing Investor Reliance on ESG Disclosures and Implications for Securities Litigation”, Berkeley Business Law Journal, Vol. 17, Nr. 2/2020.
- Seretakis Alexandros, Mezzanotte Félix E., “Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Blockchain”, European Company Law Journal, Vol. 20, Nr. 5/2023.
- Stolowy Hervé, Paugam Luc, “Sustainability reporting: is convergence possible?”, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 20, Nr. 2/2023.
- Strampelli Giovanni, “ESG, Sustainability Disclosure, and Institutional Investor Stewardship”, Washington and Lee Law Review Online, Vol. 81, Nr. 6/2024b, available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol81/iss6/2, 1. 5. 2024.
- Strampelli Giovanni, “The Limits of Including Financial Disclosure Rules in a European Capital Markets Code”, Regulating EU Capital Markets Union, Volume I, Fundamentals of a European Code (Ed. Rüdiger Veil), Oxford, 2024a.
- Ventoruzzo Marco, “Reflections on the notion of reasonable investor”, Rivista delle società, Vol. 64, Nr. 5–6/2019.
Comments are closed.