Članak
maj 13
Nazad

PROBIJANJE PRAVNE LIČNOSTI U GRUPI PRIVREDNIH DRUŠTAVA

Teodora Tadić

10.55836/PiP_26208A
SAŽETAK /

U savremenom globalnom ekonomskom okruženju, glavni značaj teorije i primene probijanja pravne ličnosti ispoljava se upravo u kontekstu grupa privrednih društava. Mnogi veliki poslovni poduhvati obavljaju se posredstvom grupa privrednih društava, pri čemu je svako društvo zaseban pravni subjekt koji uživa ograničenu odgovornost. To može stvoriti probleme za lica koja stupaju u odnose sa društvima iz grupe. Ovaj rad nastoji da pruži odgovor na pitanje šta se dešava kada zavisno društvo u okviru grupe nije u mogućnosti da izmiri svoje obaveze prema poveriocima. Rad analizira teorijske osnove instituta, uslove njegove primene i kriterijume koje sudovi koriste u praksi. Cilj rada je da pruži sveobuhvatan uvid u ulogu probijanja pravne ličnosti u grupama privrednih društava, naglašavajući njegovu ograničenu, ali značajnu primenu u zasnivanju odgovornosti matičnih društava.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici  
REFERENCE /
  1. Alting Carsten, „Piercing the Corporate Veil in American and German Law – Liability of Individuals and Entities: A Comparative View“, Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, No. 4/1994.
  2. Bainbridge Stephen M., Abolishing Veil Piercing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
  3. Bayne David, „The Philosophy of Corporate Control“, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 112, 1963.
  4. Berle Adolf, Means Gardiner, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, London, 1991.
  5. Biswas Liton Chandra, „Approach of the UK Court in Piercing Corporate Veil“, 2011, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2438217, 27. 3. 2026.
  6. Blumberg Phillip, „Limited Liability and Corporate Groups“, The Journal of Corporate Law, Vol. 11/1985–1986.
  7. Blumberg Phillip, The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for the New Corporate Personality, New York – Oxford, 1993.
  8. Brnabić Ratko, Proboj pravne osobnosti i odgovornost za obveze, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 2010.
  9. Vandekerckhove Karen, Piercing the Corporate Veil: A Transnational Approach, Leuven, 2007.
  10. Vasiljević Mirko, Jevremović Petrović Tatjana, Lepetić Jelena, Kompanijsko pravo – Pravo privrednih društava, Beograd, 2023. (Vasiljević Mirko, Jevremović Petrović Tatjana, Lepetić Jelena, Kompanijsko pravo – Pravo privrednih društava, Beograd, 2023)
  11. Vasiljević Mirko, Probijanje pravne ličnosti u kompanijskom pravu – član kompanije vs. poverilac kompanije, Beograd, 2020. (Vasiljević Mirko, Probijanje pravne ličnosti u kompanijskom pravu – član kompanije vs. poverilac kompanije, Beograd, 2020)
  12. Vasiljević Mirko, Komentar Zakona o privrednim društvima, Beograd, 2023. (Vasiljević Mirko, Komentar Zakona o privrednim društvima, 2023)
  13. Wiedemann Herbert, Die Unternehmensgruppe im Privatrecht, München, 1988.
  14. Witting Christian, Liability of Corporate Groups and Networks, Cambridge, 2018.
  15. Wooldridge Frank, „German law governing private companies in a group“, Amicus Curiae, No. 81/2010.
  16. Vujisić Dragan, „Probijanje pravne ličnosti“, Pravna misao u srcu Šumadije (urednici Božin Vlašković, Predrag Stojanović), Kragujevac, 2012. (Vujisić Dragan, „Probijanje pravne ličnosti“, Pravna misao u srcu Šumadije (urednici Božin Vlašković, Predrag Stojanović), Kragujevac, 2012)
  17. Vujisić Dragan, „Probijanje pravne ličnosti“, Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske Unije (urednik Miodrag Mićović), Kragujevac, 2019. (Vujisić Dragan, „Probijanje pravne ličnosti“, Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske Unije (urednik Miodrag Mićović), Kragujevac, 2019)
  18. Davies Paul, Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law, London, 2008.
  19. Daehnert Alexander, „Lifting the corporate veil: English and German perspectives on group liability“, International Company and Commercial Law Review, No. 11/2007.
  20. Dahal Rajib, „Salomon v Salomon: Its Impact on Modern Laws on Corporations“, Nepal, 2018, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3169431, 27. 3. 2026.
  21. Dearborn Meredith, „Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups“, California Law Review, No. 97/2009.
  22. Demeyere Siel, „Liability of a Mother Company for Its Subsidiary in French, Belgian, and English Law“, European Review of Private Law, No. 3/2015.
  23. Dignam Alan, Oh Peter B., „Disregarding the Salomon Principle, An Empirical Analysis, 1885–2014″, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, No. 16/2019.
  24. Douglas William, Shanks Carol, „Insulation from liability through subsidiary corporations“, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 39/1929.
  25. Drygala Tim, Staake Marco, Szalai Stephan, Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht: Mit Grundzügen des Konzern– und Umwandlungsrechts, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2012.
  26. Đorđević Živomir, Stanković Vladan, Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, 1987. (Đorđević Živomir, Stanković Vladan, Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, 1987)
  27. Easterbrook Frank, Fischel Daniel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.
  28. Emmerich Volker, Habersack Mathias, Konzernrecht, München, 2005.
  29. Zumbansen Peer, „Liability Within Corporate Groups (Bremer Vulkan) – Federal Court of Justice Attempts the Overhaul“, German Law Journal, No. 3/2002, dostupno na adresi: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=124, 27. 3. 2026.
  30. Jevremović Petrović Tatjana, Grupe privrednih društava, Beograd, 2014. (Jevremović Petrović Tatjana, Grupe privrednih društava, Beograd)
  31. Jovanović Nebojša, Radović Vuk, Radović Mirjana, Kompanijsko pravo – Pravo privrednih društava, Beograd, 2021. (Jovanović Nebojša, Radović Vuk, Radović Mirjana, Kompanijsko pravo – Pravo privrednih društava, Beograd, 2021)
  32. Kempin Jr. Frederick G., „Limited Liability in Historical Perspective“, American Business Law Association Bulletin, No. 4/1960.
  33. Kraakman Reinier, Armour John, Davies Paul, Enriques Luca, Hansmann Henry, Hertig Gérard, Hopt Klaus, Kanda Hideki, Pargendler Mariana, Ringe Wolf, Rock Edward, The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, Oxford, 2017.
  34. Landers Jonathan, „A Unified Approach to Parent, Subsidiary, and Affiliate Questions in Bankruptcy“, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 4/1975.
  35. Leebron David, „Limited Liability, Tort Victims and Creditors“, Columbia Law Review, No. 91/1991.
  36. Levy Marc, „Control in Pyramid Structures“, Corporate Governance: An International Review, No. 1/2009.
  37. Lipton Phillip, „The Mythology of Salomon’s Case and the Law dealing with the Tort Liabilities of Corporate Groups: An Historical Perspective“, Monash University Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 2/2015.
  38. Mendelson Nina, „A Control-Based Approach to Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts“, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 5/2002.
  39. Muscat Andrew, The Liability of the Holding Company for the Debts of its Insolvent Subsidiaries, 1996.
  40. Muchlinski Peter, „Limited Liability in Multinational Enterprises: A Case for Reform?“, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, No. 5/2010.
  41. Nobel Peter, Transnationales und Europäisches Aktienrecht, Bern, 2006.
  42. Oh Peter B., „Veil Piercing Unbound“, Boston University Law Review, Vol. 93, 2013.
  43. Pinakin Shah Monali, „„O Salomon Who Will Bell the Cat“ Need to Revisit Section 143A & 142 of NIA Act“, Chartered Secretary Journal, 2025.
  44. Powell Frederick, Parent and Subsidiary Corporations: Liability of a Parent Corporation for the Obligations of its Subsidiary, Chicago, 1931.
  45. Radović Marko, „Probijanje pravne ličnosti u kompanijskom pravu Srbije“, Zbornik radova: Radni odnosi, naknada štete i izvršenje, 2022. (Radović Marko, „Probijanje pravne ličnosti u kompanijskom pravu Srbije“, Zbornik radova: Radni odnosi, naknada štete i izvršenje, 2022)
  46. Rands William, „Domination of a Subsidiary by a Parent“, Indiana Law Review, Vol. 32/1999.
  47. Sekulić Aleksandra S., „Probijanje pravne ličnosti iz ugla sudske prakse“, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, br. 4/2023. (Sekulić Aleksandra S., „Probijanje pravne ličnosti iz ugla sudske prakse“, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, br. 4/2023)
  48. Strasser Kurt A., „Piercing the Veil in Corporate Groups“, Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 32, 2005.
  49. Thompson Robert B., „Piercing the Corporate Veil: An Empirical Study“, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 5/1991.
  50. Thompson Robert B., „Unpacking Limited Liability: Direct and Vicarious Liability of Corporate Participants for Torts of the Enterprise“, Vanderbilt Law Review, No. 1/1994.
  51. Thompson Robert B., „Piercing the Veil Within Corporate Groups: Corporate Shareholders as Mere Investors“, Connecticut Journal of International Law, No. 13/1999.
  52. Hadden Tom, „Inside Corporate Groups“, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, No. 12/1984.
  53. Halpern Paul, Trebilcock Michael, Turnbull Stuart, „An Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Corporation Law“, The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2/1980.
  54. Hansmann Henry, Kraakman Reinier, „The Essential Role of Organizational Law“, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 110/2000.
  55. Hansmann Henry, Kraakman Reinier, „Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts“, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 100/1990–1991.
  56. Harper Ho Virginia E., „Theories of Corporate Groups“, Seton Hall Law Review, No. 42/2012.
  57. Hart Karen L., Cronje Anneke, „Leggo My Alter Ego! What You Need to Know About Piercing the Corporate Veil“, Paper presented at NACM Credit Congress, Orlando, Florida, 2014.
  58. Hofstetter Karl, „Parent Responsibility for Subsidiary Corporations: Evaluating European trends“, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, No. 3/1990.
  59. Cheng Thomas, „The Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study of the English and the U.S. Corporate Veil Doctrines“, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper, 2011.
  60. Cheng-Han Tan, Wang Jiangyu, Hofmann Christian, „Piercing the Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical & Comparative Perspectives“, Berkeley Business Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1/2019.
  61. Qu Charles Zhen, Ahl Björn, „Lowering the Corporate Veil in Germany: a case note on BGH 16 July 2007 (Trihotel)“, Oxford U Comparative L Forum 1, 2008.