Članak
mar 27
Nazad

MEĐUNARODNO INVESTICIONO PRAVO I ZAŠTITA RADNIH PRAVA: STANDARD POŠTENOG I PRAVIČNOG TRETMANA I INDIREKTNA EKSPROPRIJACIJA U SVETLU IZMENA RADNOPRAVNIH PROPISA DRŽAVE DOMAĆINA

Katarina Maletić

10.5937/PiP2101035M
SAŽETAK /

Cilj ovog rada je da odgovori na pitanje da li ulagači mogu osporiti domaće radno zakonodavstvo pozivajući se na povrede međunarodnih ugovora o podsticanju i zaštiti ulaganja, i to povredu standarda pravičnog i poštenog tretmana, kao i nezakonitu eksproprijaciju ulaganja. Odgovor na ovo pitanje je naročito relevantan za države u razvoju, poput Republike Srbije, koje nastoje da usklade svoj pravni poredak sa međunarodnim principima zaštite radnih prava. Stoga će u radu biti analizirana tumačenja standarda pravičnog i poštenog tretmana i indirektne eksproprijacije data od strane arbitražnih tribunala i prihvaćena u naučnoj literaturi, kao i njihova primena u svetlu izmena radnopravnih propisa. Značajna pažnja je posvećena i relevantnim slučajevima iz arbitražne prakse u kojima je postavljeno pitanje da li države domaćini mogu povrediti ove standarde izmenom svojih propisa o radu. Istraživanje je pokazalo da izmene domaće regulative države domaćina u oblasti rada teško mogu imati karakter indirektne eksproprijacije, dok standard poštenog i pravičnog tretmana može biti povređen u slučaju nepredvidive promene radnog zakonodavstva koja bi značajno narušila garancije date od strane države u cilju privlačenja stranih ulaganja, ali ne može zaštititi ulagače od uvođenja bona fide radnopravnih propisa.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici  
REFERENCE /
  1. Brower Charles, Blanchard Sadie, „What’s in a Meme? The Truth about Investor-State Arbitration: Why It Need Not, and Must Not, be Repossessed by States“, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 52, Nr. 3/2014.
  2. Vis-Dunbar Damon, South African court judgment bolsters expropriation charge over Black Economic Empowerment legislation in the mining sector, 2009, dostupno na adresi: https://cf.iisd.net/itn/2009/03/23/south-african-court-judgment-bolsters-expropriation-charge-over-black-economic-empowerment-legislation/, 6. 1. 2021.
  3. Dolzer Rudolf, Bloch Felix, „Indirect Expropriation: Conceptual Realignments“, International Law FORUM Du Droit International, Nr. 3/2003.
  4. Dolzer Rudolf, Schreuer Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  5. Đundić Petar, „Legitimna očekivanja kao element standarda poštenog i pravičnog tretmana stranih ulaganja u arbitražnoj praksi“, Zbornih radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, br. 2/2014. (Đundić Petar, „Legitimna očekivanja kao element standarda poštenog i pravičnog tretmana stranih ulaganja u arbitražnoj praksi“, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakultet u Novom Sadu, br. 2/2014).
  6. Eric Peterson Luke, „French company, Veolia, launches claim against Egypt over terminated waste contract and labor wage stabilization promises“, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 2012, dostupno na adresi: https://www.iareporter.com/articles/french-company-veolia-launches-claim-against-egypt-over-terminated-waste-contract-and-labor-wage-stabilization-promises/, 30. 12. 2020.
  7. Zandvliet Ruben, Trade, Investment and Labour: Interactions in International Law, doctoral thesis, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, 2019.
  8. Kingsbury Benedict, Schill Stephan, „Public law concepts to balance investors’ rights with state regulatory actions in the public interest – the concept of proportionality“, International Investment Law and Comparative Law (ed. Stephan Schill), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.
  9. Kriebaum Ursula, „Human Rights of the Population of the Host State in International Investment Arbitration“, Journal of World Investment & Trade, Nr. 5/2009.
  10. Kriebaum Ursula, „Are investment treaty standards flexible enough to meet the needs of developing countries?“, Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (ed. Freya Baetens), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.
  11. Kube Vivian, Petersmann Ernst-Ulrich, „Human rights law in international investment arbitration“, EUI Department of Law Research Paper, No. 2016/02, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731770, 10. 1. 2021.
  12. Maletić Katarina, Investor obligations under international law to respect labour rights and to comply with international labour standards, 2020, dostupno na adresi: https://scripties.uba.uva.nl/search?id=c2971313, 11. 1. 2021.
  13. Prislan Vid, Zandvliet Ruben, „Labor Provisions in International Investment Agreements: Prospects for Sustainable Development“, Grotius Centre Working Paper, 2013/003-IEL, Leiden, 2013, dostupno na adresi: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2171716, 10. 1. 2021.
  14. Shemberg Andrea, „Investment Agreements and Human Rights: The Effects of Stabilization Clauses“, Working Paper No. 42, 2008, dostupno na adresi: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/programs/cri/files/workingpaper_42_shemberg.pdf, 11. 1. 2021.
  15. Sheppard Audley William, Crockett Antony, „Are Stabilization Clauses a Threat to Sustainable Development?“, Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (eds. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, Markus W. Gehring, Andrew Newcombe), Kluwer Law International, the Netherlands, 2011.
  16. Charlotin Damien, „Egyptian official confirms victory in Veolia case at ICSID, as company remains silent“, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 2018, dostupno na adresi: https://www.iareporter.com/articles/egyptian-official-confirms-victory-in-veolia-case-at-icsid-as-company-remains-silent/, 30. 12. 2021.
  17. Choudhury Barnali, „Investor Obligations for Human Rights“, ICSID Review (Forthcoming), 2019, dostupno na adresi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3500991, 10. 1. 2021.