Article
Mar 27
Back

INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND LABOUR RIGHTS PROTECTION: A STANDARD OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT AND INDIRECT EXPROPRIATION IN THE LIGHT OF CHANGES IN HOST COUNTRY LABOUR LAW

Katarina Maletić

10.5937/PiP2101035M
ABSTRACT /

The purpose of this paper is to answer the question whether investors may challenge domestic labour legislation by invoking breach of international investment agreements, in particular violations of fair and equitable treatment standard, as well as illegal expropriation of investments. The answer to this question is especially relevant for developing countries, such as the Republic of Serbia, which seek to harmonize their legal systems with international principles of labour rights protection. Therefore, the paper will explore the interpretations of the fair and equitable treatment standard and indirect expropriation given by arbitration tribunals and accepted among scholars, as well as their application with respect to the labour regulation changes. Particularly analysed is the relevant case law before arbitration tribunals dealing with the question whether host states may violate these standards by amending their domestic labour legislation. Research has shown that domestic labour regulation amendments may rarely be interpreted as indirect expropriation, while the fair and equitable treatment standard may be breached in case of unpredictable labour legislation changes which would significantly violate guarantees given by the state to attract foreign investments but cannot protect investors from the introduction of bona fide labour regulations.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)  
REFERENCES /
  1. Brower Charles, Blanchard Sadie, „What’s in a Meme? The Truth about Investor-State Arbitration: Why It Need Not, and Must Not, be Repossessed by States“, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 52, Nr. 3/2014.
  2. Vis-Dunbar Damon, South African court judgment bolsters expropriation charge over Black Economic Empowerment legislation in the mining sector, 2009, доступно на адреси: https://cf.iisd.net/itn/2009/03/23/south-african-court-judgment-bolsters-expropriation-charge-over-black-economic-empowerment-legislation/, 6. 1. 2021.
  3. Dolzer Rudolf, Bloch Felix, „Indirect Expropriation: Conceptual Realignments“, International Law FORUM Du Droit International, Nr. 3/2003.
  4. Dolzer Rudolf, Schreuer Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  5. Ђундић Петар, „Легитимна очекивања као елемент стандарда поштеног и правичног третмана страних улагања у арбитражној пракси“, Зборних радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, бр. 2/2014. (Đundić Petar, „Legitimna očekivanja kao element standarda poštenog i pravičnog tretmana stranih ulaganja u arbitražnoj praksi“, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakultet u Novom Sadu, br. 2/2014).
  6. Eric Peterson Luke, „French company, Veolia, launches claim against Egypt over terminated waste contract and labor wage stabilization promises“, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 2012, доступно на адреси: https://www.iareporter.com/articles/french-company-veolia-launches-claim-against-egypt-over-terminated-waste-contract-and-labor-wage-stabilization-promises/, 30. 12. 2020.
  7. Zandvliet Ruben, Trade, Investment and Labour: Interactions in International Law, doctoral thesis, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, 2019.
  8. Kingsbury Benedict, Schill Stephan, „Public law concepts to balance investors’ rights with state regulatory actions in the public interest – the concept of proportionality“, International Investment Law and Comparative Law (ed. Stephan Schill), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.
  9. Kriebaum Ursula, „Human Rights of the Population of the Host State in International Investment Arbitration“, Journal of World Investment & Trade, Nr. 5/2009.
  10. Kriebaum Ursula, „Are investment treaty standards flexible enough to meet the needs of developing countries?“, Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (ed. Freya Baetens), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.
  11. Kube Vivian, Petersmann Ernst-Ulrich, „Human rights law in international investment arbitration“, EUI Department of Law Research Paper, No. 2016/02, доступно на адреси: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731770, 10. 1. 2021.
  12. Maletić Katarina, Investor obligations under international law to respect labour rights and to comply with international labour standards, 2020, доступно на адреси: https://scripties.uba.uva.nl/search?id=c2971313, 11. 1. 2021.
  13. Prislan Vid, Zandvliet Ruben, „Labor Provisions in International Investment Agreements: Prospects for Sustainable Development“, Grotius Centre Working Paper, 2013/003-IEL, Leiden, 2013, доступно на адреси: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2171716, 10. 1. 2021.
  14. Shemberg Andrea, „Investment Agreements and Human Rights: The Effects of Stabilization Clauses“, Working Paper No. 42, 2008, доступно на адреси: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/programs/cri/files/workingpaper_42_shemberg.pdf, 11. 1. 2021.
  15. Sheppard Audley William, Crockett Antony, „Are Stabilization Clauses a Threat to Sustainable Development?“, Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (eds. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, Markus W. Gehring, Andrew Newcombe), Kluwer Law International, the Netherlands, 2011.
  16. Charlotin Damien, „Egyptian official confirms victory in Veolia case at ICSID, as company remains silent“, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 2018, доступно на адреси: https://www.iareporter.com/articles/egyptian-official-confirms-victory-in-veolia-case-at-icsid-as-company-remains-silent/, 30. 12. 2021.
  17. Choudhury Barnali, „Investor Obligations for Human Rights“, ICSID Review (Forthcoming), 2019, доступно на адреси: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3500991, 10. 1. 2021.