Slobodan M. Marković
10.55836/PiP_23202A
The focus of the work is on the confrontation of the traditional (de lege lata) and modern (de lege ferenda) concepts of the “three-step test”, which shows that the traditional principle of restrictiveness in the regulation of the limitation of rights gives way to the principles of purposefullness and proportionality. This enables this test to become a flexible and effective tool for adjusting the balance of relevant interests in the protection of intellectual property, in order to achieve the public interest – the improvement of creativity, development and community welfare.
The “three-step test” is, by its very nature, an instructive international legal norm addressed to the national legislator who prescribes the limitations of rights. In Serbia, this test was incorporated into the text of Law on Copyright and Related Rights and Law on Patents, which gave it the nature of a national legal norm that binds entities that apply the law. Considering the causes and consequences of this unusual phenomenon, the author criticizes the technique of harmonizing domestic law with EU law, where the emphasis is on the criterion of text matching, and not on the substantive integration of EU norms into the domestic legal order.
- Geiger Christophe, „Right to Copy v. Three-Step Test: The Future of the Private Copy Exception in the Digital Environment“, Computer Law Review International, 2005.
- Geiger Christophe, Gervais Daniel J., Senftleben Martin, „Understanding the ‘three-step test’“, International Intellectual Property (ed. Daniel Gervais), Cheltenham, 2015, доступно на адреси: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/298519957_Understanding_the_three-step_test, 20. 1. 2023.
- Geiger Christophe, Hilty Reto, Griffiths Jonathan, Suthersanen Uma, „Declaration A Balanced Interpretation of the ‘Three-Step Test’ In Copyright Law“, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 2010, доступно на адреси: https://www. ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/forschung_aktuell/01_balanced/ declaration_three_step_test_final_english1.pdf, 20. 1. 2023.
- Gervais Daniel, The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis, London 1998, 89 (наведено према P. Bernt Hugenholtz, Ruth L. Okediji „Conceiving an International Instrument on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright – Final Report“, 2008, доступно на адреси: https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2017629, 20. 1. 2023.
- Guibault Lucie, „Why Cherry-Picking Never Leads to Harmonisation – The Case of the Limitations on Copyright under Directive 2001/29/ EC“, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 2010.
- Kur Annette, „Of Oceans, Islands, and Inland Water – How Much Room for Exceptions and Limitations under the Three Step-Test?“, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series, Nr. 08–04, 2008: доступно на адреси: https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1317707, 20. 1. 2023.
- Reinbothe Jörg, Von Lewinski Silke, The WIPO Treaties on Copyright, Oxford, 1996.
- Ricketson Sam, „WIPO Study on Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment“, Document SCCR/9/7, Genève, 2003.
- Senftleben Martin, „Towards a Horizontal Standard for Limiting Intellectual Property Rights? WTO Panel Reports Shed Light on the Three-Step Test in Copyright Law and Related Tests in Patent and Trademark Law“, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Nr. 37/2006, доступно на адреси: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/228121882_Towards_a_Horizontal_Standard_for_ Limiting_Intellectual_Property_Rights_WTO_Panel_Reports_Shed_ Light_on_the_Three-Step_Test_in_Copyright_Law_and_Related_Tests_ in_Patent_and_Trademark_Law, 20. 2. 2023.
- Senftleben Martin, Copyright, Limitations and the Three-step test – An Analysis of the Three-Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law, Den Haag 2004, доступно на адреси: https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.224623, 20. 1. 2023.
Comments are closed.