Nikola Milosavljević
10.55836/PiP_25405A
At the end of 2024, the European Union amended its legislation in the field of legal protection of industrial designs. The aim of the changes was primarily to modernize the system and make it more attractive while leaving the core of the protection system unchanged. The author examines in the paper whether there were essential things that should have been altered regarding novelty as a condition of protection. In this regard, by applying the historical and legal-dogmatic method and analyzing case law, as well as the practice of the European Union bodies, he attempts to answer the question of whether the novelty requirement is at all necessary in the system of legal protection of designs in the European Union. The aim of the paper is to stimulate scientific debate on the necessity of constant reform and improvement of the system of protection of industrial design rights.
- Afori Orit Fischman, „Reconceptualizing Property in Designs“, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, No. 3/2008.
- Bently Lionel, Sherman Brad, Gangjee Dev Phillip, Intellectual Property Law, Oxford, 2018.
- Besarović Vesna, Intelektualna svojina, Beograd, 2000.
- Bulling Alexander, Langöhrig Angelika, Hellwig Tillmann, Geschmacksmuster – Designschutz in Deutschland und Europa, Köln – Berlin – München, 2006.
- Büscher Wolfgang, Dittmer Stefan, Schiwy Peter, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz, Urheberrecht, Medienrecht, Köln, 2015.
- Vlašković Božin, „Individualnost industrijskog dizajna“, Pravo i usluge (editor Miodrag Mićović), Kragujevac, 2012.
- Gielen Charles, Bombhard von Verona, Concise European Trade Mark and Design Law, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2017.
- Götting Horst Peter, Meyer Justus, Vormbrock Ulf, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Wettbewerbsrecht, Baden-Baden, 2020.
- Günther Philipp H., Beyerlein Thorsten, Kommentar Designgesetz, Frankfurt am Main, 2015.
- Eichmann Helmut, Jestaedt Dirk, Designgesetz. Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusterrechtverordnung, München, 2019.
- Elam Viola, „CAD Files and European Design Law“, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, No. 2/2016.
- Kur Anette, „Die Auswirkungen des neuen Geschmacksmusterrechts auf die Praxis“, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Nr. 1/2002.
- Kur Anette, Levine Marianne, „The Design Approach Revisited: Background and Meaning“, The EU Design Approach (editors Anette Kur, Marianne Levine, Jens Schovsbo), Cheltenham – Boston, 2018.
- Manigodić Milenko, Industrijski dizajn – zaštita modela i uzoraka u zemlji i inostranstvu, Beograd, 1988.
- Margoni Thomas, „Not for Designers: On the Inadequacies of EU Design Law and How to Fix It“, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, No. 3/2013.
- Miladinović Zoran, Varga Siniša, „Uslovi i postupak za priznanje prava na industrijski dizajn u Republici Srbiji“, Pravni život, No. 11/2011.
- Redl Gertraud, Die Schutzvoraussetzungen des Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters, Wien – Berlin, 2007.
- Ruhl Oliver, Tolkmit Jan, Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster, Köln, 2019.
- Seymore Sean B., „Rethinking Novelty in Patent Law“, Duke Law Journal, No. 4/2011.
- Suthersanen Uma, Design Law in Europe, London, 2000.
- Staub Roger, Celli Alessandro, Kommentar zum Bundesgesetz über den Schutz von Design, Zürich, 2003.
- Stolz Ekkehard, Geschmacksmuster- und markenrechtlicher Designschutz, Baden-Baden, 2002.
- Stutz Robert, Beutler Stephan, Künzi Muriel, Designgesetz, Bern, 2006.
- Schickle Lena, „Protection of Industrial Design in the United States and in the EU: Different Concepts or Different Labels“, Journal of World Intellectual Property, No. 1–2/2013.
- Torremans Paul, Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, Oxford, 2019.
- Hasselblatt Gordian, Community Design Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, München – Oxford – Baden-Baden, 2018.
- Heinrich Peter, Schweizerisches Designgesetz, Haager Musterabkommen und weitere Erlasse, Zürich, 2014.




© 2022 LAW AND ECONOMY
Comments are closed.